Lawmakers Weigh Stricter Crypto and Stablecoin Rules for Banks

Lawmakers in Congress are reportedly exploring the expansion of cryptocurrency regulations to grant credit unions and banks the authority to utilize blockchain technology, issue stablecoins, and hold digital assets. Newly released details from the Congressional Research Service indicate that legislators are actively deliberating whether operations connected to digital assets and cryptocurrencies ought to qualify as bank-permissible activities.

The report notes that passing fresh legislation would yield a sturdier framework, thereby minimizing the chance of constant regulatory shifts. Additionally, Congress is weighing whether a permanent solution—either permitting or restricting these crypto operations—is the most desirable path forward. Policy discussions surrounding permissible activities have increasingly centered on crypto over recent years. Lawmakers overseeing banks have traditionally insisted that financial institutions may only engage in crypto-related functions if those activities are legally authorized and executed securely and prudently. Nevertheless, the landscape has shifted recently alongside the emergence of the second Trump administration and the rising mainstream interest in cryptocurrency.

While discussions regarding regulatory clarity for crypto persist in the U.S. Senate, the integration of digital assets into conventional finance continues to generate significant interest. The SEC has already consented to initiate the development of more transparent crypto regulations, alongside establishing new guidelines for digital assets managed by banking institutions. Earlier this summer, the GENIUS Act authorized bank-owned enterprises to engage in stablecoin custody, issuance, and associated operations.

Also Read: Broadcom (AVGO) to lend Anthropic up to $42 billion for AI Chips

Regardless of whether a given administration aims to broaden or restrict involvement in crypto by banks, the analysis indicates that the existing regulatory foundation stays susceptible to reversals unless Congress intervenes. Moreover, adopting an open approach would provoke critical inquiries regarding liquidity, capital requirements, anti-money-laundering adherence, and potential vulnerability to fluctuations in the crypto market.